Thursday, January 31, 2019
We get what we vote for
A Virginia legislator who co-sponsored a proposed law that would have allowed abortions up to the moment of birth - indeed, in testimony one legislator admitted it would allow abortion even if the woman was already in labor - and would have allowed doctors to let some babies just die even after birth, now says she made a mistake and that in fact she had not even read the bill.
State Senator Dawn Adams admitted to her constituents(in writing), "I made a mistake, and all I know to do is to admit it, tell the truth, and let the chips fall where they may. If you follow my newsletter or have written to me to ask about my votes, you know that I do my best to read and research every bill I vote on. But I did not read a bill I agreed to co-patron and that wasn’t smart or typical. I will work harder and be better for it.”
That she didn't read the bill first is not really surprising - many politicians have done the same thing. They rely on aides to read and advise, or even just sign on because its something the party they belong to wants. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said of the Affordable Care Act, ""We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it." (Yeah, I know, she added "away from the fog of controversy." But the message is still that we would not understand its implications before it was passed, which still seems pretty irresponsible.)
Just because it's common does not make it right, though.
But will voters remember?
It may sound cynical, but having been involved in politics in a variety of ways for years, I have come to the conclusion that a substantial number of voters - maybe even a majority - don't really study the issues or candidates before voting. They vote based on who's popular, whom their friends or social set support, whose name they know, who spent the most money for ads, or simply because the candidate belongs to a particular party for which they have always voted.
We saw that in New York where Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a horrific abortion-expansion law passed by a now Democratic-controlled legislature. Even some pro-choicers have been expressing shock at the extreme nature of the abortion bill - but Cuomo was clear about his aims, and many people (myself included) warned about what he was going to do. Yet the voters still elected him, and gave the Democrats control of the legislature.
So an elected official in Virginia supporting - even co-sponsoring - a bill she never read seems par for the course. And her being reelected if she runs again would not be at all startling.
A careless, uninformed politician is simply a product of a careless, uninformed electorate.
Pax et bonum
Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Another Cuomo Clerihew
derisively dismisses excommunication's potential blow.
"I stopped being Catholic, after all,
when I embraced Moloch and Ba'al."
Pax et bonum
Sunday, January 27, 2019
Cuomo Clerihew
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo
might now be listening to the winter winds blow.
But I can't help but wonder if when he's dying
the sound that will haunt him will be of aborted babies crying.
Pax et bonum
Somewhere in New York ...
No!
She sat up in bed, swatting blindly at the
air.
Go away!
But the sounds were still there. The
crying. The babies.
Joanne Davids-Coulter looked at the clock
by the side of the bed. 6 a.m. She’d gotten, what, three hours. A typical
night. She turned on the radio. Loud. It was the only way to drown out the
crying sounds.
Even in the night. She used to sleep with
headphones on and ocean sounds playing. That had helped for a time. But she’d
had to keep playing it louder and louder. Bill – was that his name? – the last
guy she’d dated, had grown so annoyed one night with the noise and the
nightmares that he got out of the bed and left her house. He never came back.
Typical man, she’d rationalized.
But soon even the sleep tapes couldn’t
help.
She went into the bathroom and turned on
the radio there. The face in the mirror looked haggard. Black circles ringed
her bloodshot eyes.
Make-up time.
Ten minutes later, face pretty much restored, she went
into the kitchen and turned on the radio. She popped a bagel into the toaster
oven, then opened the fridge to get some orange juice.
“Mommy.”
She slammed the door shut and turned
fiercely.
“Who is doing this?” she snarled.
No one answered. But she heard crying.
She turned up the radio.
The toaster oven dinged. She took out the
bagel, coated it with cream cheese, sat at the table.
She rubbed the wooden surface. David had
bought it as a gift for her. He’d spent days stripping away the old paint,
revealing the maple beneath, and then stained it. How proud he’d been giving it
to her for their fifth anniversary.
It was all she had left of him, now. That,
and the name hyphenated to her own. Friends had suggested she go back to just
her own name. But for some reason even she did not understand, she kept the
name.
She wondered if he’d have any advice if
she called. He always seemed to have answers. Even if they were sometimes
wrong.
Especially when he was wrong.
She remembered their last fight. It was a
stupid one, really.
They’d been at a party. He’d been slightly
drunk, an increasingly frequent state late in their marriage, and was
pontificating in a history discussion when the burning of the White House by
the British during the War of 1812 came up.
“So
when they burned it in 1812 …” he’d begun.
“1814,” she’d corrected.
“What?”
“It was the War of 1812, but they burned
it in 1814,” she’d said.
“Whatever,” he’d replied gruffly.
“Just wanted to make sure your facts were
straight,” she’d said sweetly. “Wouldn’t want you to look foolish.”
She never understood why she’d said it.
But they’d become caught up in some sort of a perverse game those last months.
He, the all-knowing prosecutor. She, the all-seeing feminist social worker.
He’d hated to be corrected in public, especially when she did it in front of
her women friends. With their knowing smirks. Like at that party.
That night when they’d got home he’d said
nothing. He’d gone to bed before she did, and rose before her. When she’d
gotten up, he was gone, along with several suitcases filled with his clothes.
She rubbed the table. It squeaked.
“Mama.”
“Dammit,” she spat, throwing the bagel
across the room.
The crying seemed to grow louder.
She turned up the radio, tossed the
uneaten bagel out, and wiped the cream cheese from the wall where the bagel had
struck.
She wanted a smoke. Strange. She’d had
little desire since she’d quit 20 years before. But lately the desire had resurfaced.
Just one, a voice said. That’s all.
She went into the bathroom again, turned on the radio there, stripped, and got into the shower.
The water poured down over her body. She
rubbed herself with her hands, feeling the smoothness. She looked down,
watching the water trickle over her breasts.
“Feed me, mommy.”
“Shut up!” she screamed.
The crying seemed to pour down from the
shower head.
She shut off the water, stepped out and
dried herself hurriedly, and rushed into her bedroom. Tossing aside the towel,
she threw on some clothes. Then she glanced in the mirror. The makeup she’d put
on earlier was streaked down she face.
“Dammit,” she snarled. She went back into
the bathroom, scrubbed her face harshly. It looked back at her red and raw.
As if she’d been crying.
“Good enough,’ she barked.
As she left the house, she heard the
radios still blaring inside. They can stay on, she thought. They don’t do any
good anyway.
The car radio blasted to life as soon as
she started the motor. She turned it to maximum, and searched for a station
playing rock. Then she backed out into the street. Her tires squealed as she
pulled away.
A neighbor walking his dog looked at her.
That’s right, she thought. I’m disturbing
the peace.
On an impulse, she rolled down her window
to let the booming music pour out into the still waking suburban streets.
“Take that,” she yelled. Then
self-consciously she realized that she had indeed said it, not just thought it.
She rolled the window back up.
The announcer came on.
Shut up, she thought. Stop talking.
She flipped channels, searching for
music. She was so intent on her search that she nearly hit a car stopped at the
corner. The man behind the wheel poked his head out the window.
“Watch where you’re going, bitch.”
He sped away.
Typical man, she thought. Always running
away.
She pulled into a convenience store two
blocks away. She walked in.
“Cigarettes,” she demanded.
“What kind?” the woman at the counter
asked.
Kind? She looked at the display on the
wall behind the counter. Names she didn’t recognized. Varied sizes. She
searched rapidly, and spotted a familiar brand.
“Those,” she pointed. “Regular size.”
A moment later in the safety of the car,
the radio blasting, she lit up and took a drag.
She coughed furiously.
The memory of her first cigarette flooded
her mind.
She’d been 13, sitting on the porch with
her step father. He was smoking, looking at her occasionally.
“Like to try?” he asked, holding out his
cigarette.
She took it, looking at him to make sure
it was all right. He smiled.
She took a tentative puff.
“No,” he said. “You have to draw it in.”
She breathed in, the smoke pouring into
her lungs, and erupted into a coughing fit. He laughed and put his hand on her
back, rubbing.
“It gets easier the more you do it.”
It had become a ritual. On evenings when
her mother had to work late, they’d sit on the porch, at first sharing his
cigarettes, then each smoking their own.
“We won’t tell your mother,” he’d
promised. “It’s our secret.”
A few months later he’d come into her room
one night when her mother had to work overtime at the factory.
A new ritual.
Another secret.
And when she was 14, it was he who’d taken
her to the abortion clinic. They had sat in the car after. Smoking.
Joanne finished the cigarette. She rolled
the window down to throw the butt away and to let the smoke escape.
God, she thought, I hope I don’t smell.
Before she’d driven another few blocks,
the desire returned.
Just one more. Just one.
She lit another, telling herself she’d
throw the rest of the pack away.
At a light, the announcer came on. She
flipped channels looking for music. But at every station, an announcer or a
commercial.
Stop talking, she thought.
A cry. A long, slow wail.
She looked in the back seat, knowing she’d
see nothing.
She hit button after button on the radio.
Finally, music.
The light changed, and she realized she’d
tuned to a Christian station.
“Listen to the voice of the Lord …”
She furiously hit another button. A
country station. A singer with honky-tonkin’ on his mind.
As she approached the Women’s Health
Center, she saw the too familiar gathering of protesters out front. The
Catholics with their rosaries. The Protestants with their signs. The
leafleters approaching any woman who neared the center. And the Reverend Wes
Newman.
Hate welled up in her. Reverend Newman had
been leading protests at the center since long before she had become the
director. Three days a week he was there with some of his followers and allies.
But what made it even more galling was
that a part of her admired him. His church ran a food pantry, a soup kitchen, a
homeless shelter, and a shelter for battered women. He had taken pregnant teens
into his own home, he and his wife treating them like their own daughters. Some
of those girls were now regular picketers.
Reverend Newman saw her approaching. He
smiled broadly, mouthing something she couldn’t hear because of the radio.
She suddenly realized she still had the
cigarette in her mouth. She stubbed it out, steeled herself, and drove past the
picketers. Several of them called out as she passed, their words drowned by a
woman on the radio singing about a man who’d gone away.
She parked in the director’s spot and
looked at the protesters. None of them looked violent, but she made sure the
pistol was in her purse anyway. It was.
She got out of the car. Now she could hear
them.
“Don’t kill babies today,” one woman
pleaded.
"We can help," another said.
“The door’s always open,” a familiar voice
said.
She turned sharply. Reverend Newman waved.
“Come by for coffee,” he called, making
sure he stayed beyond the court-mandated buffer zone. “We can talk.”
Damn your talk, she thought. She hurried
to the door. The security guard opened it.
“Can’t you do something about them?” she
demanded.
“Sorry, ma’am,” he replied. “As long as
they don’t trespass, there’s nothing I can do.”
“Nothing. That’s all anyone ever does to
shut them up.”
She looked at his name tag. Raphael
Torres. Why did that sound familiar? Then she remembered.
“I’m … I’m sorry about your girlfriend,
Rafe,” she said, trying to sound sincere. “It was horrible. Murdered like that. Did they catch ... are you sure you’re
up to being here?”
“It’s better than being home.”
“I understand,” she replied. “I …”
Suddenly a woman yelled, “What about the babies?”
“Keep them away,” Joanne snapped. “That’s
what I pay you for.”
She hurried past the waiting room and
staff. She ignored their greetings. Her secretary rose to speak, but Joanne
waived her away and slammed her office door.
She looked around. Panicked, she opened
her door.
“Carol,” she barked. “Where’s my radio.”
“Don’t you remember,” Carol stammered.
“It’s out being fixed. The speakers …”
“Get me another,” she snarled and closed
her door.
Try another cigarette, the voice in her
head said. She reached into her purse. Her fingers found the gun.
Scare them, the voice said. Just scare
them away.
She closed the purse quickly and sat with
her hands knotted on the desk.
The sound of the crying returned, It grew louder.
She put her head in her hands.
Dozens of babies.
She picked up the phone and punched in
Carol’s extension.
“Yes?” Carol answered.
“Where’s that radio?”
“We’re looking,” Carol replied.
Joanne hung up.
She looked at the purse.
Go
ahead, the voice said. Just one. Just a little smoke.
A child who sounded in pain cried out.
“Stop!” she screamed, grabbing the purse.
Carol burst into the room. “Are you all
right?”
“Stop talking!” Joanne said.
“I … I’m sorry,” Carol blurted. “I just …”
“Shut up!” Joanne roared, pulling out the
gun and firing.
Carol staggered back, blood blossoming on
her blouse near her left shoulder. She fell to the floor to the left of the
door.
There were screams outside her door.
“Quiet,” Joanne screeched, rushing past
the fallen Carol into the outer office. One worker looked at her.
“There’s shooting,” the worker sobbed.
“The antiabortionists …”
“Stop crying,” Joanne shrieked and shot.
The bullet missed high. The woman wailed
and ran into the hall.
Joanne followed. Panicked staff members
looked at her, eyes wide with terror. The air was full screams and whimpers.
“Stop that crying,” Joanne screeched.
One keening woman fled out the front
door. Joanne raced after her.
The woman ran across the parking lot. The
picketers were staring open mouthed. Joanne saw the Reverend Newman.
“Leave me alone,” she howled.
She fired. The bullet stuck a woman
standing near the minister.
“Typical man,” Joanne rasped. “Let the
woman suffer.”
She ran toward him and fired again. He
staggered back and fell to one knee.
Rafe, who had been sent to get a radio,
had rushed to the door when he’d heard the shooting. He burst out, gun in hand, expecting to find a gun-wielding anti-abortion fanatic. What he saw was Joanne
shooting at the kneeling minister. The bullet missed low, ricocheting off the
pavement and striking a man in the leg. The man screamed and fell.
Rafe scanned the fleeing crowd.
Where’s the shooter. The boss must be
acting in self-defense.
“Where?” he called out to Joanne.
She wheeled.
“Quiet,” she roared, and fired at him.
The bullet struck the glass door. Shards
sprayed Rafe.
Confused, he ducking behind a car.
She turned and faced the minister. He
looked at her and held out his hand.
“No one is going to hurt you,” he said
gently.
“Mommy,” came the voice.
“No!” She howled. “Leave me alone.”
She walked up to the minister and pointed
the gun at his head. Rafe jumped from behind the car.
“Stop,” he barked.
Joanne smiled wickedly at the minister.
“Smokin’,” she croaked.
As her arm tensed, Rafe fired. The bullet
struck her square in the back. She spun around, facing Rafe, who fired again.
The second bullet hit her in the chest and she staggered back, falling to the
ground next to the minister.
Reverend Newman crawled over to her. He
cradled her head in his lap.
“Help is coming,” he said. “I’ll pray for
you.”
She looked at her chest in confusion. The
blood stain spread.
“Feed me, mommy,” the voice said.
Then the crying. Babies. Dozens. Hundreds.
Thousands. How many?
“Please,” she gasped.
“I’m here,” the minister whispered. “I
won’t leave.”
The last thing she heard was the wail of
the approaching sirens.
Like thousands of babies.
(The above is an excerpt from an unfinished novel.)
Pax et bonum
Saturday, January 26, 2019
Sodom on the Hudson
With the last election, the Democrats finally have control of the entire state government. There has been a sudden rush to pass bills that have been blocked for years. Some are good, yes, but those good ones are outweighed by the horrible ones, and in particular by the expansion of abortion.
I feel frustrated. I can't leave the state. I live in a district where a supporter of this sort of evil will win reelection until he retires, and will then be replaced by a like-minded politician. And even the bishops are failing to take strong action.
I have no real power here to try to stop the evil, other than protesting and writing.
As a faithful Catholic who resides in New York, I now have a sense of what it felt like to live in Sodom.
I will continue to pray - that hearts might be changed, and that I will not give in to despair.
Pax et bonum
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Friday, January 11, 2019
Is "liturgical dancing" permitted at Mass?
Is "liturgical dancing" permitted at Mass? | Catholic Answers
According to Catholic Answers, no.
Pax et bonum
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Two Found Poems
My wife was cleaning out some old papers in her closet. Among those papers she found a notepad with a couple of haiku I'd written at some point.
fallen leaves
on elderly neighbor's lawn -
an estate sale sign
Indian summer -
neighbors nod as they rush through
season's last mowing
I don't know if I scribbled them then just forgot about them, or if I thought they were not that good and planned to come back to them later, but they got swept up with other papers.
Whatever the case, here they are.
Pax et bonum
Sunday, January 6, 2019
A debate over the Franciscan Action Network (FAN)
On the Secular Franciscan Order Facebook page there has been some debate over the Franciscan Action Network, with concerns about its actions and its seeming political partisanship, and over the order providing it with funding.
I posted the following to help with the discussion:
Some recent posts and comments about the Franciscan Action Network (FAN) suggest that we really do need to have a frank discussion about that group and support for it by the order.
FAN does deal with issues that are of concern to Franciscans as a whole - particularly the environment and immigrants lately, but also the plight of the poor. FAN is not afraid to make public witness when it comes to these issues - again, that is something that is perfectly in keeping with being Franciscans.
But, there are many in the order who have concern that FAN focusses almost exclusively on those particular issues, essentially ignoring other important issues, ones that some feel are of more immediate importance and are more directly life-threatening. Moreover, the positions taken lately by FAN give the appearance of being extremely partisan politically.
I have heard of Secular Franciscans who have refused or considered not paying their Fair Share in part because funding goes to FAN. I had a conversation with a member of a Fraternity who said some of its members have become so upset they have suggested breaking away from the Order. I don't know how widespread such talk is, but it is troubling.
I suggest:
- A frank, objective discussion of FAN and what it does so we have facts (a discussion, and not just a statement from the National);
- If the concerns linger. that officials from the National have a clear discussion with FAN about what is acceptable and what is not;
- If the concerns are legitimate that FAN make some changes;
- If those changes are not made and the current pattern continues that the Order cut funding for FAN.
Thoughts? Please, keep the discussion factual and objective, and voice them with Franciscan charity.
FAN does deal with issues that are of concern to Franciscans as a whole - particularly the environment and immigrants lately, but also the plight of the poor. FAN is not afraid to make public witness when it comes to these issues - again, that is something that is perfectly in keeping with being Franciscans.
But, there are many in the order who have concern that FAN focusses almost exclusively on those particular issues, essentially ignoring other important issues, ones that some feel are of more immediate importance and are more directly life-threatening. Moreover, the positions taken lately by FAN give the appearance of being extremely partisan politically.
I have heard of Secular Franciscans who have refused or considered not paying their Fair Share in part because funding goes to FAN. I had a conversation with a member of a Fraternity who said some of its members have become so upset they have suggested breaking away from the Order. I don't know how widespread such talk is, but it is troubling.
I suggest:
- A frank, objective discussion of FAN and what it does so we have facts (a discussion, and not just a statement from the National);
- If the concerns linger. that officials from the National have a clear discussion with FAN about what is acceptable and what is not;
- If the concerns are legitimate that FAN make some changes;
- If those changes are not made and the current pattern continues that the Order cut funding for FAN.
Thoughts? Please, keep the discussion factual and objective, and voice them with Franciscan charity.
Pax et bonum
Saturday, January 5, 2019
Questionable economic policies are not comparable to abortion
I'm getting tired of the people who justify supporting the Democratic Party and pro-abortion politicians by arguing that the Republicans support the rich over the poor.
First of all, it's a false point about the Republicans. Some do indeed favor the rich - so do some Democrats - but many sincerely believe that their economic policies will help the poor. Those policies can be debated, but Republicans and Conservatives are not just heartless mercenaries.
Moreover, even if it is true, the moral scales are very different.
We are dealing with prudential judgment vs. a non-negotiable.
We are talking about stealing vs. murder.
Stealing a person's wallet is bad. Killing a person is worse.
Is it possible to be a pro-life Democrat. Yes. But around here you would not be electable.
It's more likely that one can be a pro-life Republican who really does care about the poor. And you can get elected.
Pax et bonum
Thursday, January 3, 2019
About that Vatican "Wall"
President Trump reportedly invoked the Vatican Wall to support his border wall (as have many of his supporters). Seen St. Peter's Square?
NO WALL. The boundary between Italy and the Vatican is a white line in the pavement.
He's repeating a false talking point - likely out of ignorance, not deliberately lying. But still ... .
Pax et bonum
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Pro-life help for women and children
One of the frequent accusations made by abortion supporters is that pro-lifers only care about the baby in the womb, and do nothing to help the woman or the child after.
This is, of course, false. There are homes and ministries and agencies that help the women and their children long after the children are born. Many programs help the women get back on their feet, and support them through the effort, providing direct assistance and guidance.
Here in Rochester, for example, we have the Margaret Home.(I played a role as secretary of the board, helping to get the project off the ground, including getting it incorporated and locating a building to purchase; more capable people have advanced it.)
In this file I will compile links to other such places and organization. I will update it regularly as I find more addresses.
A National Catholic Register article that talks about some of that help - http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/supporting-life-walking-with-women-and-their-babies
A Coalition of groups/organizations that help - http://www.natlhousingcoalition.org/?fbclid=IwAR3BrFbHf7k_9OEvrUAMv_TA3YdcW_wcudja3GmPRZQqCJeKCdu9_N9UjrY
Good Counsel Homes - http://www.goodcounselhomes.org/
St. Joseph's House - https://www.jhfw.org/
Siena House - https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2018/12/25/siena-house-welcomes-women-with-open-arms/?fbclid=IwAR3QlBGuczJo7XzYVdLDySKNmYN_2UaY0NNIwBUXc4Wn0GsK1Pw5WHnngv4
Bethany House (for homeless women and children) - https://bethanyhouserocny.org/
Maggie's Place (out in Phoenix) - https://www.maggiesplace.org/
Malta House - https://www.maltahouse.org/
Compass Care - medical help, counseling, material assistance, etc - https://www.compasscare.info
Pax et bonum
But, it's art ...
"If I can do it, it's not art." - heard from Red Green, but others have said it.
Pssst - one of these is actually mine!
Pax et bonum
Conversion
Conversion has two elements for its completion. First, we need to rid ourselves of the things that hinder gospel living. That includes not only “stuff” but also habits, attitudes, mindsets, lifestyles etc. that hinder hearing and living the Gospel. Secondly, conversion calls us to commit our lives to Jesus and his gospel call. It calls for practicing charity, having hope, learning how to love all people. If we only clean out our lives, we create a vacuum into which all sorts of things can enter (cf. Luke 11:24-26). Our inner housecleaning ordinarily should open a path for the Holy Spirit to work in our lives.
- Lester Bach OFM Cap
Pax et bonum
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
The year ahead
It's traditional at this time of the year to make resolutions. Last year, for example, I resolved to lose weight. I did. It's back. Sigh.
I'll try again.
There are some other things I hope to do.
More spiritual reading. More consistent prayer life. Less snarky comments on social media. Less arguing on social media. Practice guitar more and learn more songs.
One thing I do want to do is to increase my posts on this blog. Last year I posted 255 times. That's down from 306 in 2017. My goal is to get closer to 365 - one a day. Hopefully with something worth saying each time.
Two down; 263 to go.
Pax et bonum
Renewing the Profession Promise
Alleluia - a new year.
It's a day for resolutions. Among those we Secular Franciscans can make is to recommit to the promises we made at our profession.
That ritual includes the following:
I, N.N.,
by the grace of God,
renew my baptismal promises
and consecrate myself to the service of His Kingdom.
Therefore,
in my secular state,
(or, when appropriate: as a member of the diocesan clergy,)
I promise to live
all the days of my life
the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ
in the Secular Franciscan Order
by observing its Rule of life.
May the grace of the Holy Spirit,
the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary
and our holy father Saint Francis,
and the fraternal bonds of community
always be my help,
so that I may reach the goal
of perfect Christian love.
This is also the 40th anniversary of the revised Rule - a good time to reread it and reflect on all that it means and how well we are following it.
Pax et bonum
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)