Sunday, July 30, 2023

No one can use my body ...


No one can use my body without my permission.

This is the argument that, although the baby in the womb is human, they do not deserve the same rights as the mother because unborn babies have not become persons yet.

In this worldview, a person is not a person because they are human; you become a person through experience and thought.

Being human is not enough to be worthy of protection.

Therefore, since unborn babies are not persons, the woman has more rights than the unborn baby and she does not have to offer the child protection.

Babies in this scenario are often affectionately referred to as “parasites” because they are using the mother’s body without her permission.

We must recognize that the right to live doesn’t increase with age, size, location, or degree of dependence 

The moment we begin reasoning this way, consistency demands that anyone, from infants to the elderly, if dependent upon others for their survival, can be killed because they are inconvenient.

This faulty thinking often leads to pregnancy being portrayed as a condition to which the mother has not consented.

Of course, pregnancy is a natural consequence of sexual relations between a man and a woman.

These are overwhelmingly consensual acts 

No one is forcing women to get pregnant.

Therefore, the analogy is inaccurate from the beginning.

The mother and her child are not enemies. What is at stake in this scenario is the lifestyle of the mother over against the baby’s actual life.

The argument is based on the idea that if the woman doesn’t want the baby that came about as a result of her actions, she can conveniently dispose of the inconvenience if it gives her relief.

We live in a culture that wants freedom without responsibility.

Pax et bonum

Thursday, July 27, 2023

Mayella Ewell's Abortion



When I was a teacher, one of my favorite books to teach was To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. I taught - and reread - the book multiple times, and I've seen the great movie repeatedly.

The movie was on last night, and, of course, I watched it.

It suddenly dawned on me that it provides parallels to abortion.

One of the villains - and one of the most tragic figures - in the book and movie is Mayella Ewell.

Mayella lives on a farm with her siblings and her drunken, abusive father. She is fearful, lonely, and obviously feels unloved. 

She's like too many young women who turn to sex to find love, and become pregnant. 


In Mayella's case, she seeks that love from Tom Robinson, a completely innocent Black man who helps her when he can, but has never made any kind of romantic overtures. He treats her well, something she has not experienced in her sad life 

One day she gets him in the house ostensibly to help with something, but then grabs him and kisses him.

In the South at that time, a White woman kissing a Black man was unthinkable.

He tries to get away, but just at that moment Mayella's father sees what's happening.

Tom does get away. Mr. Ewell beats Mayella.

Mayella now faces a desperate situation. If word got out about what she did she would be even more of a social outcast than she already was. And she risks her father's continued disapproval - which, he has already demonstrated, could include physical violence.

Again, her situation parallels that of so many young women who find themselves unexpectedly pregnant as a result of choices they made.

In her desperation, and likely under pressure from her father, she accuses Tom of rape. Mayella needs to deny her own guilt. She needs to get rid of Tom,

In the South at that time, Tom, as a Black man, is viewed by society as somehow less human, maybe even not human. 

Similar to the way the unborn are viewed by many parts of our society today.

After a trial, at which Tom's innocence is made clear, Tom is nevertheless found guilty. He later panics and tries to escape, and is killed.

In effect, he is aborted.

Desperate woman fearing reactions and consequences seeks to get rid of the reminder of her choices and guilt, viewing that reminder as somehow less than human, resulting in the death of a innocent being.

So like abortion.

She is a victim as well - of those who are supposed to love her, of her society that's ruled by ignorance.

So like so many women today when faced with unplanned pregnancies.

My message to pro-choicers: Don't be a Mayella Ewell, and don't treat women like so many Mayella Ewells.

Pax et bonum

Sunday, July 23, 2023

Sigh - Margaret Coel At It Again



I had read a couple of the early Wind River Mysteries involving Father John O'Malley and attorney Vicky Holden.

They are interesting characters. He is a recovering alcoholic assigned to a reservation mission. She is an Arapaho who struggles with trying to balance her Native American roots and her functioning in a White world.

Early on, it was clear that they had romantic feelings for each other. He remains true to his vocation, but there is constant tension.

Okay. I can see that. It made me wonder if Coel, who identifies as a Catholic herself, had such an attachment or temptation. How many Catholic women fall in love with their unobtainable priest? 

That may have no basis in reality - I don't know enough about her to say it is true. But it is constantly there in the books.

I enjoyed them enough to be open to reading more of the books in the series. 

So when I happened to see one of the later books in the series in the library - Killing Custer - I decided to give it read. I was looking for something lighter, and a decent mystery fit the bill.

In this 17th book in the series they clearly still have feelings for each other  - Vicky most obviously. I'm not sure how much time has passed in the series' universe, but it logically has been years, and as I read this entry I kept thinking, come on, get over it.

And now Vicky, while still thinking about the priest, is nevertheless living with a guy. Sigh. The lack of morality in the secular world intrudes. 

 Meanwhile, Vicky and Father once again stupidly place themselves in a situation where their lives are in danger, and they are saved only by the grace of God and the novelist's pen. In all those years, after those 16 previous mysteries, haven't they learned anything?

I found that frustrating.

It was a decent mystery - though I did figure out who was behind the crimes about a third of the way through. To be honest, I found some parts of it a little implausible, and the book as a whole was disappointing. 

Interestingly, Coel only wrote three more books in the series. The twentieth book in the series, Winter's Child (2016), was declared to be the final one. Perhaps Coel herself found that she had stretched the characters as far as they could go. Or maybe it was a matter of her being in her late 70's by this point!

So I might check out Winter's Child to bring the series to a close. But I don't feel an overwhelming desire to read any of the other books at this point.

Pax et bonum

Thursday, July 20, 2023

Saturday, July 15, 2023

The Woman Caught In Adultery



The Woman Caught in Adultery

John 7:53 Then each of them went home, 8:1 while Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2 Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him and he sat down and began to teach them. 3 The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery; and making her stand before all of them, 4 they said to him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery. 5 Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They said this to test him, so that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 And once again he bent down and wrote on the ground. 9 When they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the elders; and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. 10 Jesus straightened up and said to her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?” 11 She said, “No one, sir.”And Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again.”

When issues of sin and forgiveness come up, people like to cite this story. But many focus on the mercy and forgiveness, downplaying sin, and use the story as a way to attack someone who brings up sin or who says something is wrong. They frequently declare, "Don't judge" (forgetting that actually we are called to judge right and wrong), and often leave off the "and from now on do not sin again" part. 

I think they miss a couple of points.

First, Jesus did point out that she was a sinner. When He says "do not sin again," He is declaing that she did sin. 

True, He did not preach at her about her sin; He didn't have to. She was brought before Him - in some depictions she is either chased or dragged - by men who planned to stone her. The seriousness of her sin had already been made clear to her; she was facing death because of it. So there was no need for Jesus to beat her over the head with it. 

But he does bring up the fact that she did sin, and tells her not to sin again. It's a command, not a wishy-washy, "Well try to sin no more." 

"Do not sin again."

So while the people who bring this up as an example of mercy and forgiveness, they are right. But if they leave out the sin part, and the fact that Jesus declared what she did a sin, they are watering it down.   

Pax et bonum

Tuesday, July 11, 2023

Hard Times Was Not Hard To Read!



I just finished Hard Times by Charles Dickens. I thoroughly enjoyed it! 

Indeed, I enjoyed it so much that I'm tempted to start another one as part of my hope to finish reading them all (though I have set no deadline for doing so).

Here's my Dickens' tally so far. The indented books are ones I own; the bolded ones are ones I've read.

     The Pickwick Papers (1836) 
     Oliver Twist (1837)
     Nicholas Nickleby (1838)
     The Old Curiosity Shop (1840)
Barnaby Rudge (1841)
Martin Chuzzlewit (1843)
     Dombey and Son (1846)
     David Copperfield (1849)
     Bleak House (1852)
     Hard Times (1854)
Little Dorritt (1855)
     A Tale of Two Cities (1859)
     Great Expectations (1860)
     Our Mutual Friend (1864)
The Mystery of Edwin Drood (1870)

And some of the Novellas

     A Christmas Carol (1843)
     The Chimes (1844)
     The Cricket on the Hearth (1845)
The Battle of Life: A Love Story (1846)
To Be Read at Dusk (1846)
The Haunted Man (1848)
The Hanged Man's Bride (1857

Pax et bonum

Monday, July 10, 2023

Keep Those Cluster Bombs Over There!



All this talk of sending to Ukraine cluster bombs - which many nations prohibit, but not us, of course - reminded me of a song I wrote years ago. 

Over There

We're all for a confrontation,
a little war in another nation,
But don't you touch our loved ones here at home.
We think a fight is a might fine notion
just keep it across the ocean,
and don't you touch our loved ones here at home.

Over there, over there
You must keep it over there
Over there, over there,
you must keep it over there.

We will send you guns and bullets,
tanks and planes and shoes that don't fit,
but don't you touched our loved one here at home.
We'll even send our sons and daughters,
just don't make us watch the slaughter,
and don't you touch our loved ones here at home.

Over there, over there
You must keep it over there
Over there, over there,
you must keep it over there.

Yes, wars are meant for foreign places
let those nations change their faces,
but don't you touch our loved ones here at home.
We don't want to start rebuilding
our factories and office buildings,
so don't you touch those loved ones here at home.

Over there, over there
You must keep it over there
Over there, over there,
you must keep it over there.

Over there, over there
You must keep it over there
Over there, over there,
you must keep it over there.

Pax et bonum

Saturday, July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court Changed My Sex Life Forever


Mary's Perpetual Virginity



Jason Evert in Catholic Answers addressed the issue of Mary's virginity that some of our Protestant brothers and sisters keep bringing up. (Note, I refer to them as brothers and sisters even though we are not actually siblings!) 

“I’ve never understood why Catholics claim that Mary was a virgin her entire life. The Bible says that Jesus had brothers. Matthew 13:55 settles the matter for me: ‘Is not this the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brethren James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And are not all his sisters with us?’”

In answering any biblical objection to the faith, step number one is putting the other at ease by agreeing that if a teaching contradicts Scripture, the teaching must be wrong.Next, examine the biblical evidence. In the case of Mary’s perpetual virginity, the key to explaining Matthew 13:55 is understanding the Greek word for “brethren” (adelphoi) and its feminine counterpart (adelphe). If the Greek words used in this passage connote only siblings, then the Catholic dogma of Mary’s perpetual virginity is false.However, the word adelphoi has a much broader meaning. It may refer to male relatives that one is not a descendant of and that are not descendant from one (such as a blood brother, step-brother, nephew, uncle, cousin, etc.) or non-relatives such as neighbors, fellow workers, co-religionists, and friends.

Because of this broad usage, we can be sure that the 120 “brothers” in Acts 1:15 did not have the same mother. Neither did Lot and his uncle Abraham, who were called “brothers” (Gen. 11:26-28, 29:15).

The reason relatives were called brothers or sisters was because in Hebrew, there was no word for cousin, nephew, or uncle. So the person was referred to as simply a “brother.” Linguistically, this was far easier than calling the person the son of a mother’s sister. Since the New Testament was written in a dialect of Greek that was heavily influenced by the Semitic culture, many of the Hebrew idioms (like “brother” having multiple meanings) intrude into the Greek text. So, the fact that Jesus had adelphoi does not mean that Mary had other children. ...

Read the rest here.



Pax et bonum

Better Not To Tell About Serious Sin?


From Dave Armstrong

Q: If you have to know that a sin is “grave” in order for it to be mortal (full knowledge and consent) then why would you want to tell someone that something is grave matter? Wouldn’t their ignorance of grave matter keep them from committing mortal sin and thus not endanger their salvation?

A: It's important that people are aware of what is a grave sin. Even if not knowing that sin x which has been committed is a grave matter and objectively a mortal sin (but not subjectively due to ignorance), a person is still harmed, as sin does no one any good and ultimately leads to spiritual death (Rom 6:16, 23; 7:11; 8:2; Jas 1:15; 5:20). Therefore, people ought to know what is considered serious sin, because habitual committing of such sins will eventually exclude one from heaven (see, e.g., Rev 21:8: "But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, as for murderers, fornicators, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their lot shall be in the lake that burns with fire and sulphur, which is the second death" [RSV] ).

Pax et bonum

Wednesday, July 5, 2023

Thank You, Mr. Moto - HD


A Dickens of a Reading Goal!


Back in high school, I read A Tale of Two Cities, and loved it. I went on to read David Copperfield and A Christmas Carol, and later, Bleak House.

I liked Charles Dickens so much that I wanted to read more of him, and when I applied to graduate school it was to a school where a noted Dickens scholar taught. Alas, he was on sabbatical the year I was there, so I never got to take his Dickens course.

I've read some Dickens since on my own. Now I want to read at least all of his completed novels. I haven't set a deadline for doing so per se, just want to read one or two a year. I'm currently reading - and enjoying - Hard Times. (Note: I finished it, and The Cricket on the Hearth after originally posting this.)

Here's the list of novels. I've indented the ones I own and bolded the ones I've already read.

     The Pickwick Papers (1836)
     Oliver Twist (1837)
      Nicholas Nickleby (1838)
     The Old Curiosity Shop (1840)
Barnaby Rudge (1841)
Martin Chuzzlewit (1843)
     Dombey and Son (1846)
     David Copperfield (1849)
     Bleak House (1852)
     Hard Times (1854)
Little Dorritt (1855)
     A Tale of Two Cities (1859)
     Great Expectations (1860)
     Our Mutual Friend (1864)
The Mystery of Edwin Drood (1870)


And some of the Novellas

     A Christmas Carol (1843)
     The Chimes (1844)
     The Cricket on the Hearth (1845)

The Battle of Life: A Love Story (1846)

To Be Read at Dusk (1846)
The Haunted Man (1848)
The Hanged Man's Bride (1857

Ah, such pleasant reading ahead!

Pax et bonum

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

Sir Thomas More - by various authors, including Shakespeare


I read all 38 of the officially recognized plays by Shakespeare - one of my reading goals. But there was another play linked to him: Sir Thomas More.

Shakespeare was not main author of this play. He was reportedly called in to help  revise it, and added a some lines. 

Thus it is not a true Shakespeare play.

But the fact that he helped with a play that celebrates a Catholic hero is interesting, given the anti-Catholic politics of England under Elizabeth I.

Originally written b
y Anthony Munday and Henry Chettle, it was later heavily revised by Thomas Heywood, Thomas Dekker, and Shakespeare. It's unclear when it was first produced - I saw theories it may hve been performed as early as 1591. It avoids the specific issue that led to the executions of More (and St. John Fisher, and other character), which makes sense given the danger of doing so under Elizabeth, under whom many Catholics were martyred. But More in the play is clearly noble and heroic - which would be a risky thing to suggest given the times.

Why did Shakespeare become involved? Was he just helping friends? Was he doing it as a loyal member of the theater company? Of was there a bit of Catholic sympathy? After all, there are many suggestions that Shakespeare may have been raised as a Catholic, and may even have continued secretly practicing.

Whatever the reason for Shakespeare's involvement, this play certainly is part of his legacy.

Pax et bonum

Sunday, July 2, 2023

Another True Story. Really.


(Continuing my "research" into family stories ...)

Cousin Raibeart had nearly completed his apprenticeship as a blacksmith in the village of Milfield, Northumberland. He already had the right look for being a blacksmith: He was 6'3" with 220 pounds of solid muscle gracing that frame. He also had flaming red hair that rippled over his broad shoulders.

The problem was that the blacksmith to whom he was apprenticed had made it clear that once the apprenticeship was completed - and his obligation as a mentor was fulfilled - Raibeart would have to move on. The blacksmith's young son was soon to be old enough to apprentice, and would take over the smithy eventually.

So Raibeart was already beginning to consider his future. He found a good place to do that was in a local tavern over many a tankard of ale.

In addition to drinking toasts to his future, Raibeart was fond of playing dirks. Dirks was a game developed by bored and slightly drunk men who lived along the Scottish/English border. In the game participant's paired off, and one would stand still against a wall and the other would throw dirks attempting to create an outline of the one against the wall without actually hitting him. They would then switch positions and repeat the standing and throwing. The object was to create the best outline with the dirks, and the one who did so would have his drinks paid for by the other. Of course, if the thrower did hit the other one standing against the wall, he would automatically lose and have to pay for drinks and any medical care required.

Raibeart was quite skilled at this game, and often did not have to pay for drinks. But that meant he was also often challenged. One night, the son of the local laird issued such a challenge.

The laird's son threw first, and created a reasonably decent outline, but it was one that Raibeart knew he could better. The laird's son took his position against the wall, and Raibeart began his throws. But when Raibeart aimed for just to the left of the lairdling's head, the target sneezed and his head jerked to the left. The dirk glanced off his left eye, blinding it. 

Under the rules of the contest, he moved, and so should have lost. But he was the son of the laird, and he raised a hullabaloo. Suddenly Raibeart found himself released prematurely from his apprenticeship, and no one in area would hire him for fear of the laird. He also heard that the laird had made it known that if anything should happen to Raibeart whoever did the "anything" would not face legal consequences.

Raibeart took the hint and left town.

As for the laird's son, he quickly became known as One-Eyed Wullie (even though his given name was James). He also became known for quickly taking offense at any perceived slight, and consequently issuing challenges to duels. Now in most duels, the combatants were generally more interested in honor being served than in actually inflicting mortal harm on their opponents, and so they would aim to miss with whatever weapon had been selected, or at worst to hit in some non-fatal spot. But being one-eyed, Wullie made it know his aim was not always accurate, so his opponents always apologized or left town before the duel began. Thus Wullie never lost a duel.

But back to wandering cousin Raibeart.

Not having any proof that he had completed his apprenticeship, he couldn't find a blacksmith shop that would take him in. The father of the lairdling he had maimed also had many relatives, friends, and allies in Northumberland, so Raibeart could not even find work as a laborer.

He wandered from town to town, sleeping where he could, and "finding" food as best he could.

One night he sought shelter in a barn, sleeping in the the hay listening to the rhythmic breathing of the cows. He hoped to "find" some eggs in the morning and sneak out before the farmer or his family ventured into the barn.

But he was startled awake at dawn when a door to the barn creaked open. In stepped a dark-haired maiden.

Now this maiden happened literally not figuratively to be the farmer's daughter. And she also happened literally not figuratively to be the most beautiful young woman in Northumberland, and by all accounts, in any of the border counties. She had the kind of beauty that reduced adolescent males to babbling idiots - even more pronouncedly than their normal state of adolescent babbling idiocy - and made grown men stutter.

The slanting rays of the rising sun shone through gaps in the walls of the barn striking her like a spotlight in the theater. 

Raibeart was stunned by her beauty, and stood unable to even stutter.

It just so happened that silhouetted from behind by the light of the rising sun he appeared even more gigantic than he actually was, and the maiden was duly impressed. But finding a giant in the barn was not a normal situation, and being quick of wits she picked up a pitchfork and held it toward Raibeart.

"Who are you?" She demanded. "What are you doing here?"

"I'm ... m ... m ...  m," he managed to stutter.

"Stop that," she ordered, vexed that yet another man stuttered when talking to her. "Speak plainly."

He took a deep breath. "Raibeart. I'm Raibeart. I mean no harm."

She brandished the pitchfork. "And you'll cause none."

He nodded. 

"I just sought shelter her for the night," he continued. "I'll just leave."

He cautiously stepped out from the hay. He was no longer silhouetted, and she could see his face.

She liked what she saw.

"Have you had anything to eat?" She asked.

"No," he replied, a hint of anticipation in his voice. "Not since yesterday morning."

"Wait here," she ordered.

She left the barn and returned in a couple of minutes with some bread, cheese, and milk,

Raibeart gratefully took the food and said, "Thank you." 

Then he began to eat hungrily.

"Why were you sleeping in our barn? Don't you live somewhere?"

"Not anymore," he said. Then seeing interest in her eyes, he told his story.

As he spoke, she listened carefully. She liked his voice, and the polite way he spoke. There was no crude language of the kind she was used to hearing.

When he was done with his story, she asked, "So you have no place to go?"

"No. I need to keep looking."

She studied him for a moment, and then said, "I have an idea."

She then explained her family situation. Her brothers had been conscripted for a work party by a noble whose domain included the farm. That left just her father and herself to run the farm. But her father hurt his leg badly, and would not be able to do much for a few weeks. She could not keep up with the work, and they needed help until he got better, or until her brother returned, but all the able-bodied men had also been conscripted by the noble. But, she suggested, if Raibeart approached the farm from the roadway, and asked if there was work, her father might be willing to hire him for a couple of weeks.

Raibeart liked the plan. He needed work. And it would allow him to be near the lovely maiden, whose name he had learned was Margaret.

So Raibeart left the barn, cut across the field to the rod, then turned around and walked up to the house. Margaret's father was sitting in front of the door. He eyed Raibeart suspiciously. Raibeart stopped a few feet from the father, and nodded his head politely.

"God's blessing on you sir," Raibeart said. 

"Aye, and bless you too," the father replied flatly.

"I am a stranger passing through these parts," Raibeart said. "I'm not a beggar. I'm looking for work, even if for only a day or two."

 "I have noth ...," the father began. But then Margaret burst through the door.

"How lucky," she blurted. "With Henry and Joseph off conscripted there are some heavy tasks I need help with."

The father reluctantly agreed to hire him on a trial basis.

Raibeart set to work immediately. There was much to do, but by the end of the day he had made a good start. The father, who had watched him, had to admit that the hire was a good one. Raibeart's pay included his meals, and so he joined father and daughter for dinner. They ate in silence for most of the meal. Raibeart carefully avoided making eye contact with Margaret.

"You work hard," the father finally said between chews. "We could use you tomorrow."

Raibeart left after eating, walked down the road until he was out of sight, then cut across the fields and entered the barn from behind - as he and Margaret had arranged in advance. There they talked whenever she came into the barn to bring in the cows, to feed the chickens, and to carry out other chore's she suddenly discovered she had to do.

The pattern continued for nearly three weeks. The farm was coming back into shape, with repairs made, crops planted, a well restored, and more. 

Meanwhile, Margaret's visits to the barn became more frequent and lasted longer. She told him of her life and dreams. She told him about her mother who had educated Margaret along with her brothers. She sadly recounted the death of her mother two years before, and how she had to be the housekeeper in her stead. She said she loved her father and brothers, but wanted a home and family of her own. And she wanted to marry a man she loved, not a man just chosen by her father for practical reasons. Raibeart told her of his own life. He recounted the death of his mother when he was young, and how his father struggled to take care of him. His father had apprenticed him to a blacksmith, and then disappeared. he had no idea where his father was now. He recounted his years with the blacksmith, and how he was about to lose his place when the dirks game forced him to leave. And he too told how he dreamed of meeting a woman to love, and starting a family of his own.

Soon the subject of marriage came up. And both agree that that was what they wanted, but Margaret said it would be hard because of her father's intentions for her making a good match.

They both sighed often, and dreamed together that if it was possible, they would be together.

It became harder and harder for Raibeart to keep his eyes off Margaret when her father was around.

And finally, her father noticed.

As they sat down to dinner at the end of those three weeks, the father said. "My leg is better. The farm is in good shape, and I can handle it from now on. Thank you for all you did. We won't need you after today. We'll settle up after dinner."

After dinner, Raibeart got his pay. Saying thanks, he headed down the road. But then he cut across the fields to the back of the barn. He went in and waited.

He had almost given up when Margaret quietly entered through the usual door.

"What are we going to do," Raibeart asked.

Margaret held up a small satchel. "We get as far away from here as we can before morning and father finds out I'm gone."

So they headed out, walking in the dark to the next town. After the sun rose they went to the church, found the minister in his garden, and asked him to marry them. He studied them for a moment, and then smiled.

"I eloped with my wife years ago," he said. "Never regretted it."

And he married them.

The two continued on, still trying to distance themselves from her father's farm. When darkness came, along with it came rain. They took shelter in an abandoned cottage.

With rain drumming on the roof - and trickling through holes in that roof, they considered their situation.

Married. Very much in love. But love does not fill empty stomachs.

They counted the few pence they had from what Raibeart had earned working for his father-in-law and what she had saved.

While dodging trickles of rainwater, they alternated suggesting plans.

None of them seemed possible. 

Then Margaret remembers a story from the Bible where a husband and wife pretended just to be brother and sister. She added a few twists.

Raibeart agreed to give it a try.

The next town, they walked in as brother and sister. They strolled around the market together, making sure people believed they were siblings, that they were low on funds, and that Margaret was a maiden.  They then separated, and Margaret continued to walk about the market alone.

Adolescent males looked at her, and started babbling idiotically.

Grown men looked at her, and began to stutter. 

Finally, one of the stutterers approached her, and stuttered an invitation. Feigning innocence, she went with him off to a secluded spot. Suddenly the man stuttered an inappropriate suggestion. Margaret loudly proclaimed, "No." At that signal, Raibeart burst out from where he had been discretely watching the encounter, brandishing his dirk.

"Hands off my sister," he bellowed.

The stutterer, who had not actually placed his hands on her, fell to his knees, stuttering a plea for mercy.

"My family's honor," Raibeart roared, moving toward the hapless kneeler, who managed to stutter than perhaps the honor could be restored financially.

Raibeart lowered his dirk. The stutterer proffered coins. Raibeart rebrandished his dirk. The stutterer proffered additional coins.

Raibeart took the coins, waived the stutter on - who promptly fled - and then Raibeart and Margaret quickly left the scene.

The repeated this scheme multiple times, working their way across Northumberland, into Durham, and into Cambria. 

Periodically, they would give up their sibling pose and register in an inn as the married couple they were. After one of those periodic married couple stops, Margaret found herself with child.

She was even more beautiful in the way pregnant women could be, but they realized their scheme would not work with an obviously pregnant woman. They decided for the sake of the child it was time to settle down. 

They traveled north into Scotland, opting to travel by coach due to Margaret's condition, and soon found themselves in the city of Greenock on the Clyde River. The city was growing rapidly as a seaport. Raibeart used some of the money they had accumulated to buy out an elderly blacksmith's business, and began to ply the honorable trade for which he had trained. With the city booming, his business prospered.

Not long after they settled in Greenock, a son arrived to Margaret and Raibeart. He was followed by three other sons and three daughters.

Raibeart learned his letters as Margaret taught them to their bairns, and he became a prominent man of business in the city.

Meanwhile, the four sons became large, red-haired men fond of such physical displays as tossing cabers. The three daughters grew into dark-haired beauties who made adolescent males babble like idiots, and grown men stutters.

Sons and daughters all eventually married, and Raibeart and Margaret were soon surrounded by grandchildren.

They settled into old age together, doting on children and grandchildren, and glad they were married and not brother and sister. 

Pax et bonum

Think Fast, Mr. Moto - HD