Monday, April 26, 2021
Spiritual Health Care
Wednesday, April 21, 2021
Reacting to a pop poet (rk)
Monday, April 19, 2021
The Shape Shifter (Hillerman)
My latest read mystery book - the 11th this year already! - was the last book by one of my favorite mystery writers, Tony Hillerman: The Shape Shifter.
Sunday, April 18, 2021
Joni Mitchell - House Of The Rising Sun (Official Audio)
Thursday, April 15, 2021
The declarations of BSM activist Mjinga Asiyejua
Tuesday, April 13, 2021
Spencer Tracy's Statement - Judgment at Nuremberg
The principle of criminal law in every civilized society has this in common: Any person who sways another to commit murder, any person who furnishes the lethal weapon for the purpose of the crime, any person who is an accessory to the crime -- is guilty.
... A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult!
Before the people of the world, let it now be noted that here, in our decision, this is what we stand for: justice, truth, and the value of a single human being.
Simple murders and atrocities do not constitute the gravamen of the charges in this indictment. Rather, the charge is that of conscious participation in a nationwide, government organized system of cruelty and injustice in violation of every moral and legal principle known to all civilized nations. The Tribunal has carefully studied the record and found therein abundant evidence to support beyond a reasonable doubt the charges against these defendants.
Heir Rolfe, in his very skillful defense, has asserted that there are others who must share the ultimate responsibility for what happened here in Germany. There is truth in this. The real complaining party at the bar in this courtroom is civilization. But the Tribunal does say that the men in the dock are responsible for their actions, men who sat in black robes in judgment on other men, men who took part in the enactment of laws and decrees, the purpose of which was the extermination of human beings, men who in executive positions actively participated in the enforcement of these laws -- illegal even under German law. The principle of criminal law in every civilized society has this in common: Any person who sways another to commit murder, any person who furnishes the lethal weapon for the purpose of the crime, any person who is an accessory to the crime -- is guilty.
Heir Rolfe further asserts that the defendant, Janning, was an extraordinary jurist and acted in what he thought was the best interest of this country. There is truth in this also. Janning, to be sure, is a tragic figure. We believe he loathed the evil he did. But compassion for the present torture of his soul must not beget forgetfulness of the torture and the death of millions by the Government of which he was a part. Janning's record and his fate illuminate the most shattering truth that has emerged from this trial: If he and all of the other defendants had been degraded perverts, if all of the leaders of the Third Reich had been sadistic monsters and maniacs, then these events would have no more moral significance than an earthquake, or any other natural catastrophe. But this trial has shown that under a national crisis, ordinary -- even able and extraordinary -- men can delude themselves into the commission of crimes so vast and heinous that they beggar the imagination. No one who has sat through the trial can ever forget them: men sterilized because of political belief; a mockery made of friendship and faith; the murder of children. How easily it can happen.
There are those in our own country too who today speak of the "protection of country" -- of "survival." A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient -- to look the other way.
Well, the answer to that is "survival as what?" A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult!
Before the people of the world, let it now be noted that here, in our decision, this is what we stand for: justice, truth, and the value of a single human being.
The judge was right about the Holocaust.
Saturday, April 10, 2021
Mulling
Thursday, April 8, 2021
The Divine Mercy Message of St. Francis of Assisi
Sunday, April 4, 2021
Saturday, April 3, 2021
Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America (David Horowitz)
I had seen Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America by David Horowitz hyped on a number of talk shows.
Friday, April 2, 2021
Baseball Been Berry Berry Bad ...
Trent's Last Case (Bentley)
I've been hearing for years that E.C. Bentley wrote a highly regarded mystery novel. I had known him as a friend of G. K. Chesterton, and the creator of clerihews, the four-line humorous verse form I write, and which was named after him (his middle name is Clerihew).
Good Friday Pro-Life Stations of the Cross
Thursday, April 1, 2021
Biden Gets WaPo 4 Pinocchios - in other words, he blatantly lied
“Among the outrageous parts of this new state law, it ends voting hours early so working people can’t cast their vote after their shift is over,” Biden added.
The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler responded to those two claims and pointed out that nowhere in the law are voting hours limited and early voting was, in fact, expanded.
“On Election Day in Georgia, polling places are open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., and if you are in line by 7 p.m., you are allowed to cast your ballot. Nothing in the new law changes those rules,” he wrote.
“However, the law did make some changes to early voting. But experts say the net effect was to expand the opportunities to vote for most Georgians, not limit them.”
Kessler’s article included comments from several election experts who disagreed with Biden’s characterization of the bill.
“So where would Biden get this perception that ordinary workers were getting the shaft because the state would ‘end voting at five o’clock’?” Kessler wrote. “We have one clue.”
He continues: "The law used to say early 'voting shall be conducted during normal business hours.' Experts said that generally means 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The new law makes it specific — 'beginning at 9:00 AM and ending at 5:00 PM.' A Georgia election official said the change was made in part because some rural county election offices only worked part-time during the week, not a full eight-hour day, so the shift to more specific times makes it clear they must be open every weekday for at least eight hours."
The article also pointed out that Biden’s home state of Delaware did not allow any in-person early voting last November.
Biden, along with fellow Democrats, has been urging Congress to pass a massive voting rights bill that is currently being weighed in the Senate after being approved by the House.
The bill, known as H.R. 1 or the For The People Act, would significantly erode voter ID and voter registration laws in a move that Democrats say is necessary to expand access to voting and Republicans have labeled as a power grab.
Recent polling on the issue shows that the public overwhelmingly supports voter ID laws, including 69% of the black community, which Democrats have argued are prevented from voting because of voter ID laws.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-gets-four-pinocchios-from-washington-post-over-claim-georgia-voting-law-slashes-poll-hours-and-early-voting/ar-BB1f8dLV?ocid=uxbndlbin
Pax et bonum